· 1 min read
Your data team's calendar is an architecture document
Read the recurring meetings the way you would read a systems diagram. The standing sync is a missing interface with attendees.
#operations#teams
Modernize the data platform without betting the company on it.
Warehouse migrations, lakehouse adoption and analytics delivery, always starting with a fixed-scope assessment instead of a signature on a year-long engagement.
- Fixed scope and a fixed quote, every engagement
- A roadmap your team can execute without us
- Platform-neutral: no reseller margins, no referral fees
What we take on
Data modernization, in the concrete sense: moving specific workloads to a platform your team can run, at a cost you can defend.
Warehouse migration
Planning and executing moves between warehouses, or from legacy ETL into one. Inventory, cutover design, parallel running and the decommission list nobody writes.
Lakehouse and analytics
Table formats, catalogs and the analytics layer on top. We help you decide whether you need a lakehouse at all before helping you build one.
Governance and strategy
Ownership, access, quality gates and a data strategy that fits on one page. The minimum set that keeps auditors and engineers both functional.
Assessment first, always
The first engagement is the same for everyone: a fixed-scope Data Platform Assessment. Small, bounded, and useful even if we never work together again.
Data Platform Assessment
Two to three weeks. We inventory workloads, costs, and failure points, and interview the people who run them. You get a written findings report and a ranked roadmap.
Roadmap you own
The roadmap names sequences, risks and decision points, priced in effort rather than optimism. It is written so your team can execute it without us.
Delivery, if wanted
If you want help executing, we scope the next engagement from the roadmap. Fixed scope each time. No year-long statements of work.
Guides
The same checklists and decision frameworks we use inside engagements, published in full.
· 2 min read
Gate these three things before agents touch the warehouse
The platform vendors are wiring AI agents into enterprise data as fast as they can acquire the parts. The gates to install first, sized at a week each.
#agents#governance
· 1 min read
How to read a warehouse migration case study before you believe the number
Three published migrations claim 20%, 50% and 65% savings, each in a different direction. Four questions turn a vendor's headline into a number you can plan with.
#migrations#cost#vendor-claims
Fair questions
What does the assessment cost?
A fixed fee, quoted before we start, based on the number of systems in scope. The scoping call that produces the quote is free and takes thirty minutes.
Which platforms do you work with?
The major cloud warehouses and lakehouse stacks. The assessment is platform-neutral by design: the recommendation is what fits your workloads and team, not a partner agreement.
Can our team execute the roadmap without you?
That is the design goal. The roadmap is written for your engineers, with sequencing and risks spelled out. Some clients hire us for delivery; some do not. Both are fine outcomes.
Do you resell software or take referral fees?
No. Recommendations would be worthless otherwise.
Start with the assessment.
Describe your platform and what hurts. You get a reply within two business days with an honest read on whether an assessment would help, and a fixed quote if it would.